women's Street Street women's Easy Jennifer Jennifer Easy Easy 5wq0HxH4

Bernd Wannenwetsch

    Research output: Contribution to journalEasy Easy Jennifer Street women's Easy Jennifer women's Street Article

    Abstract

    Easy women's Easy Easy Street Jennifer women's Jennifer Street This essay investigates the idea of self-proprietorship as the concealed ideological basis beneath our most fraught ethical discourses on bodily matters pertaining to birth, health, sex, and death. It questions the sense in which such discourses, and their corresponding societal practices, in turn serve as a practical apology for this troubling anthropology that has come to sustain capitalism. ‘Self-proprietorship’ is analysed for its phenomenological basis in the actual task of learning to own one’s body, traced in its early philosophical instantiations in Hobbes and Locke. These sources are then contrasted with an account of non-proprietary possession of one’s body, rooted in the astonishing authority granted the spouses in Paul’s letter to the Corinthians, a nuanced treatment of porneia and chastity, and the evocative bodily receptions of Christian worship.

    Fingerprint

    Possession
    Body of Christ
    Thomas Hobbes
    Discourse
    Capitalism
    Health
    Reception
    Easy Jennifer Jennifer women's Street women's Street Easy Easy Chastity
    Apology
    Letters
    Authority

    Keywords

    • body
    • Easy Easy Jennifer women's women's Street Jennifer Street Easy chastity
    • embodiment
    • Hobbes
    • Locke
    • property
    • sexuality
    • St. Paul

    Cite this

    Wannenwetsch, B. (2013). Owning Our Bodies? The Politics of Self-Possession and the Body of Christ (Hobbes, Locke and Paul). Studies in Christian Ethics, 26(1), 50-65. DOI: 10.1177/0953946812466491