Crevo Crevo Crevo men's men's Blake men's men's Crevo Blake Blake Blake 78qxX

Bernd Wannenwetsch

    Research output: Contribution to journalmen's men's Crevo Blake Blake men's men's Crevo Crevo Blake Blake Crevo Article

    Abstract

    Crevo Blake Blake men's Crevo Blake Crevo men's men's Blake Crevo men's This essay investigates the idea of self-proprietorship as the concealed ideological basis beneath our most fraught ethical discourses on bodily matters pertaining to birth, health, sex, and death. It questions the sense in which such discourses, and their corresponding societal practices, in turn serve as a practical apology for this troubling anthropology that has come to sustain capitalism. ‘Self-proprietorship’ is analysed for its phenomenological basis in the actual task of learning to own one’s body, traced in its early philosophical instantiations in Hobbes and Locke. These sources are then contrasted with an account of non-proprietary possession of one’s body, rooted in the astonishing authority granted the spouses in Paul’s letter to the Corinthians, a nuanced treatment of porneia and chastity, and the evocative bodily receptions of Christian worship.

    Fingerprint

    Possession
    Body of Christ
    Thomas Hobbes
    Discourse
    Capitalism
    Health
    Reception
    Crevo Crevo Blake men's Blake men's Crevo men's Crevo Blake Blake men's Chastity
    Apology
    Letters
    Authority

    Keywords

    • body
    • men's men's men's Blake Crevo Blake Crevo Blake Blake men's Crevo Crevo chastity
    • embodiment
    • Hobbes
    • Locke
    • property
    • sexuality
    • St. Paul

    Cite this

    Wannenwetsch, B. (2013). Owning Our Bodies? The Politics of Self-Possession and the Body of Christ (Hobbes, Locke and Paul). Studies in Christian Ethics, 26(1), 50-65. DOI: 10.1177/0953946812466491